Layout:
Home > Gender Unquality

Gender Unquality

September 19th, 2024 at 08:48 am

Stumbled across this tweet.  The scary part is I don't think this is uncommon.  In fact, I think the vast majority of Americans are in the same boat.

When I thought about what her options are, I immediately thought, "She needs to find a rich, gullible man."  which as a guy, I hate having thought that.  Most men don't have that kind of luxury and have to work for our own money.  To be fair, I imagine most women would prefer having their own money as well.

In desperate times though, and with limited options, what do you think?  Should she try to find and marry a rich, gullible guy?

10 Responses to “Gender Unquality”

  1. Petunia 100 Says:
    1726788656

    I have encountered men who were looking for a woman to support them. I don't think this way of thinking is unique to one gender.

    I think that this woman ought to get serious about taking responsibility for herself. Being dependent on someone else for your financial well-being is not a good situation to be in.

  2. Dido Says:
    1726798456

    Marriage isn't necessarily a way out. You take on the other's debts as well as your share of any jointly owned assets. If her husband were a higher earner, then she could qualify for a potential "spousal bump" in her own Social Security when he starts collecting, or a Survivor benefit that exceeds her own benefit.

    But--age 49, assume she is halfway through the year. If she starts today putting aside $100 a week and retires at age 70, she would have amassed $185,715 assuming a 5% rate of return. If she took $175,000 of this at age 70 and invested in an immediate annuity, that would generate $1,203 in monthly income for the rest of her life. (The other $10k is her emergency fund.)

    Assuming an average worker's benefit at Full Retirement Age of $1,907 (which is the current average), if she defers collecting SS until 70, with the Delayed Retirement Credits, she would get $2,402 per month in 2024$. $1,203 + $2,402 = $3,605 per month or $43,260 per year. That's 2.87 times the Federal Poverty Level income for a single person. If she lives frugally and invests more along the way, say $200 a week, she gets to an annual income of $58,524. Not rich but certainly survivable. With hard work, she could increase her current income and her current savings and do even better.

    I actually started tracking my net worth when I was 49. I'm now 64. I had more than $900 back then (about $158k), and today (two professional designations and several jobs later), my net worth hit a million for the first time and my salary has more than tripled. It can be done.

    It starts with awareness, and then, as Petunia said, taking responsibility.

  3. Tabs Says:
    1726809432

    Dido, just wanted to say congrats on hitting the big million net worth! Congrats!

    I completely agree with the both of you that everyone should learn to be financially responsible, both men and women alike. I certainly wish I had started earlier myself.

  4. Single Guy Says:
    1726843289

    I looked up her X posts (or is it called a timeline?). OMG, she is a train wreck of massive proportions. I don't think you can take her post and say this applies to others (though maybe I don't go around the general populace???). In any case, any guy worth his salt would stay far far away from her.

  5. PatientSaver Says:
    1726876767

    I don't feel especially sympathetic with her. I mean, she never thought about this until age 49? As Dido pointed out, it's not too late to salvage what remaining working years she has left, provided she has the discipline and intelligence to focus on retirement.

    Saving for retirement for most people is a decades-long endeavor. It takes a lot of sacrifices. I'm not sure she's up to the task.

  6. Tabs Says:
    1726881779

    Single guy: I didn't go checking up on her, but am not at all surprised if she is indeed a financial train wreck. People like that scare to be if I am being honest, and yet, I find it surprising a large percentage of population is just like her, and I don't know how they are going to survive....

    PatientSaver: Yeah, I do think a lot of people do this to themselves in the end. Luckily for some like her, at least she is realizing the dangers, later rather than never.

    I am not trying to be critical or anything, but I did find Dido's estimates to be a bit uh optimistic. It kind of assumes that nothing goes wrong and that she lives only 20 more years? However, I do agree that so long as one becomes aware and seriously works on it, they still have a fighting chance somehow. Certainly, I have nothing against whoever she is. I wish her the very best, and that she survives in the end.

  7. Dido Says:
    1726923646

    Tabs, thanks for the congratulations! It's appreciated.

    The 20 years is NOT for lifetime, it's for working years. Actually, I used 20.5 years in my calculations. If you know Time Value of Money calculations, I calculated Future Value using Payment of $100 a week, Interest at 5% (5%/52 for calculations, since it's weekly), Time Frame of 20.5 years (again, x 52 because it's weekly). That yields a future value (starting from $0) of $185,715.20. I assumed she saved about 10k of that for an emergency fund and then priced the value of an immediate annuity on immediateannuities.com for a 70 year old single woman.

    In fact, my calculations were focused on guaranteed lifetime income, which both Social Security and Annuities are. SS has the annual COLA. I did not include an inflation rider on the annuity payment calculation but you can add inflation protection riders, since the annuity payment (fixed once started unless the inflation rider is added) are determined by interest rates. I ran that calculation before the Fed rate cut, and today it shows as $1,188 per month, a $15 decrease.

    So it doesn't matter how long she lives--I was assuming 20 years of work, not life!

  8. Tabs Says:
    1726924229

    Dido: Oh my, that is so embarrassing on my part for mistaking that time frame. Thank you for taking the time to clear it up.

  9. Dido Says:
    1726925264

    Tabs, no problem!

    I'm not the most concise writer, so assumptions probably get lost in the verbiage. When I write for work, I always benefit from a good editor!

  10. LivingAlmostLarge Says:
    1727136658

    The longer she works the less money you need to have saved. So if you work until you can't work, you might have enoug to survive. That's what I tell people with minimal savings, keep on working so you aren't drawing on what you don't have.

Leave a Reply

(Note: If you were logged in, we could automatically fill in these fields for you.)
*
Will not be published.
   

* Please spell out the number 4.  [ Why? ]

vB Code: You can use these tags: [b] [i] [u] [url] [email]